U.S. Rep Pete King Wants Your Cell Phone Camera to Go “Beep”

U.S. Rep Pete King Wants Your Camera Phone to Go "Beep"

U.S. New York Representative Pete King (Republican, Long Island) introduced a new bill in Congress this month H.R.414: “To require mobile phones containing digital cameras to make a sound when a photograph is taken. ” The short title of the bill is simply, “Camera Phone Predator Alert Act.”

From the bill:

” (a) Requirement- Beginning 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, any mobile phone containing a digital camera that is manufactured for sale in the United States shall sound a tone or other sound audible within a reasonable radius of the phone whenever a photograph is taken with the camera in such phone. A mobile phone manufactured after such date shall not be equipped with a means of disabling or silencing such tone or sound.

(b) Enforcement by Consumer Product Safety Commission- The requirement in subsection (a) shall be treated as a consumer product safety standard promulgated by the Consumer Product Safety Commission under section 7 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2056). A violation of subsection (a) shall be enforced by the Commission under section 19 of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2068).”

Now I’m a father of four young children, and nobody wants to protect their children from predators more than I do, but this is just plain stupid.

First off there are many times that you don’t want your camera to make audible noises. Let’s say your shooting your own kid in the school play. Having a bunch of disruptive beeps going off every time someone takes a photo is annoying. There are many times when you want to shoot something being less disruptive not being more disruptive. There are certainly plenty of times and places where it is perfectly appropriate to try and be as quiet as you can while shooting.

Secondly, this bill only applies to cell phones. So if some predator wants to try to sneak photos of kids in the locker room all they would have to do is use a regular old point and shoot camera which this bill doesn’t apply to. In fact, spy type cameras have been around for years and if someone really wants to try to take stealthy photos, they certainly can without the need to use their cell phone camera. The law also does nothing to address video.

Then of course there is the part of the bill that this would only apply to new phones. So let’s see, a predator then could, theoretically, still use any old cell phone that they want to take silent phones while millions of law abiding users have to put up with noisy beeps going off whenever they shoot.

I have no idea what the cost of implementing this technology would be, but I’m sure AT&T would figure out some way to make the “enhancement” a reoccurable fee every month on your cell phone bill.

It seems to me like this bill is yet another example of really bad ideas coming from government. It would seem that this is not the first boneheaded idea that Rep. King has come up with by the way. Another of his winner ideas was responsible for funneling $3 million in taxpayer money to a campaign donor for custom manhole covers that Con Ed said could be dangerous in — order to fight those pesky terrorists. At least that’s the way the Daily News reported it. I thought Republicans were supposed to be for less government not for more.

ArsTechnica has more on this new bill here. Thanks, Geoff!

  • January 26, 2009 at 1:47 pm Thomas Hawk
  • January 26, 2009 at 1:54 pm João Almeida
    Who puts himself surrounded by little boy scouts in his homepage? That banner looks very silly...
  • January 26, 2009 at 1:59 pm Thomas Hawk
    João, well he did manage to get both the words "Predator" and "Alert" in his bill's title. That ought to be good for headlines.
  • January 26, 2009 at 2:02 pm JazJaz
    Boy scouts? Groan!
  • January 26, 2009 at 2:07 pm stretta
    THINK OF THE CHILDREN! Great. The Government wants to protect us from predators who wish to take clandestine pictures of my kids, but the same government doesn't seem to think twice about destroying the enviroment or saddling our kids with crushing debt.
  • January 26, 2009 at 2:08 pm Bjorn Tipling
    Heh. I want him to stfu. We can't all get what we want though.
  • January 26, 2009 at 2:13 pm David Parmet
    Peter King is a neanderthal. The worst kind of US Right or Wrong GOPer. Just a fool. Just ignore him and he'll move onto another issue...
  • January 26, 2009 at 2:25 pm Chris Charabaruk ∈ Cool
    I hate how idiots like this guy give all us "right-wingers" a bad name and demonstrate why the "left-right" dichotomy is bullshit. (Well, even 2-dimensional views of politics are poor; I prefer the 3-D model myself.)
  • January 26, 2009 at 2:37 pm Craig Eddy
    If the government can mandate how much gas your car can use per mile, why can't they mandate the noises your phone makes?
  • January 26, 2009 at 4:25 pm Will Cragoe
    The US economy is imploding and this is what we are doing in Congress?
  • January 26, 2009 at 4:52 pm Rene Wirtz
    Looks like another form of filibustering: putting laws up for vote with the only goal to usurp the house's and/or senate's time. It's disgusting.
  • January 26, 2009 at 4:57 pm Thomas Hawk
    I tried to email him a link to my post but the emailing form on his website seemed to be out of order. Gotta get someone in there to fix that thing.
  • January 26, 2009 at 4:58 pm Rene Wirtz
    What are you saying Thomas, that the good representitave is running a little behind with his use of technology?
  • January 26, 2009 at 5:02 pm Glenn Batuyong
    Love the comments on this from slashdot.org: '...then how about the CCTV's all making a noise when they photograph everyone. If they want everyone to respect their law, they should lead by example and prevent their CCTVs from filming without people knowing.' '...From a loudspeaker next to the camera: "Fear not citizen, you are being filmed for your own protection. Be Well."'
  • January 26, 2009 at 5:03 pm Thomas Hawk
    +1 for Glenn.
  • January 26, 2009 at 5:07 pm Glenn Batuyong
    "This will weaken our war on terror by blowing the cover of anti-terrorist agents who are photographing suspected evildoers!" i'm just kidding of course but as you can see it's pretty easy to build an argument against this using the right-wing's favorite talking points...

25 Comments

  1. Nicole Young says:

    Wow, seriously? What a waste of money and resources.

  2. Plug1 says:

    another reason i am unhappy with my Blackberry. it makes a fake shutter sound which cannot be deactivated.

    and agreed, this idea is silly and full of holes.

  3. [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments No comments for this entry yet… [...]

  4. cheses100 says:

    if you think this is wierd then click on my name

  5. Adam Ness says:

    Yeah, the phone is required to beep, but anyone with a soldering iron and rudimentary electronics training would be capable of removing the speaker. Or heck, anyone with a ball of cotton could stuff it in the speaker and muffle or silence it too.

    But then hey, it’s a lot like the Patriot Act: perception of safety is much more important than actual safety. Just because security measures can be easily circumvented doesn’t mean that the congress won’t enact them.

  6. [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments Post tags: Address, Aims, Cameraphone Pictures, Cameraphones, Cellphones, Consumer Products Safety Commission, Digital Cameras, Engadget, Hawk, Japan, Nbsp, Odd Chance, Predator, Radius, Representative Pete, South Korea, York Representative Posted in: Gadżety | | [...]

  7. [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments Copyrighted to Source [...]

  8. Marcus says:

    There are far more pressing matters to be exerting energy towards.

  9. [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments Written by startme in: Engadget | [...]

  10. [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments View this Post in: Share and Enjoy: [...]

  11. jason pollard says:

    I believe this is the law in Japan. They were having problems with pervs taking upskirt shots on trains, escalators, etc. I agree that it just annoys normal people, and the weirdos have to just a wee bit harder.

    In fact, my latest digicam, a japanese model bought this summer, makes a shutter click sound (I don’t know ATM if this can be turned off). All previous cameras I’ve owned have been silent.

  12. Scott Bourne says:

    I thought Republicans were for LESS government?

  13. Hal says:

    Definitely a stupid bill and another example of a waste of money. The law can not keep pace with tech in this matter. If they would enforce the laws and deal properly with predators this really wouldn’t be an issue. Instead, they throw them back on the street.

    Besides, like you mention, predators are more likely to use some other means of getting photos. Like a zoom lens from the safety of their vehicle, the cowards. Not only that but the advent of Flip like recorders are probably just as likely if not more so to be used.

    Complete waste of time and money. Enforce and carry through the current laws against predators!

  14. alan p says:

    It is already happening in Japan to prevent voyeuristic photography:

    http://broadstuff.com/archives/1081-Upskirts-and-Down-with-Hemlines!.html

  15. [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments aaaaaa<a href="http://inkandvirtue.com/2009/01/27/proposed-bill-would-require-all-cameraphones-to-make-themselves-heard/" >Proposed bill would require all cameraphones to make themselves heard</a> [...]

Leave a Reply