Windows 7: A better Vista?
LOS ANGELES--Microsoft on Tuesday offered up far more details on Windows 7, successor to the company's oft-maligned Windows Vista.
In particular, Microsoft is focused on improving the time it takes for Windows to start up and shut down. In addition to its own work, Microsoft has been working directly with computer makers to address all of the factors that affect system performance.
As far as other features, Windows 7 features support for multitouch input and a new taskbar that makes it easier to manage multiple open Windows.
"The focus is on making sure the things you do (today) are easier and that the things you always wanted to do are possible," Corporate Vice President Mike Nash said in an interview Monday. "There's a lot of work we've done to just make things easier and faster.
The early, prebeta version being handed out to developers at the Professional Developer Conference here has all of the programming interfaces that will be in the final version but only some of the planned features.
Several enthusiasts who have been checking out the new code for the past couple of days praised the stability of the release, particularly for an operating system, at this early stage.
With Windows 7, Microsoft has changed the way it approaches building early releases. In the past, Microsoft included features at various stages of development. With Windows 7, features are included in the main Windows build, only after they are fully baked.
Microsoft is clearly looking to leave a far different first impression than it did with Windows Vista, which made major changes under the hood and led to considerable incompatibilities. With Windows 7, Microsoft is not introducing any major changes to the Windows kernel and is keeping much of the other plumbing substantially similar to that of Vista.
The software maker has also tried to reduce some of Vista's other annoyances, such as the frequently criticized User Account Control feature, which some complained led to too many annoying dialog boxes. With Windows 7, users will be able to choose for themselves how often the system warns them of changes being made to their computer.
The next external release of Windows 7, a feature-complete public beta, is slated for early next year.
Nash wouldn't say whether the company plans more than one beta version before its final release. "We'll see how the first one goes," he said.
The company has said it will have the release out within three years of Vista's January 2007 mainstream release, however, CEO Steve Ballmer has said he wants Windows 7 out next year.
Take that, Steve Jobs!
I switched to Mac in 2001. I switched back to Windows in 2005 :)
There are many things that are faster on XP. And it has less bugs. If you like Vista, you might as well get a Mac because Vista (like OS X) is just designed to wow you with flashy UI (which in reality is nauseating if you are not a Mac or MS fanboi), rather than actually being an invisible engine upon which your real apps run.
This does seem to portend well, in direct counterpoint to your comment.
/P
Your growing level of shrillness is astounding to behold. Its like the unfolding of a flower.
"In that case, tell us Dan: Why does an allegedly revolutionary OS still carry bugs in it from eight years ago? "
I'm not sure, perhaps you should ask Apple that question for the multitude of iTunes bugs, OS X bugs, and more?
Really now, you can do better than that if your'e just here to troll. Come back when you have something useful to say.
I am, however, willing to give Win7 a chance, because I'm always open to the latest tech, and I'm okay with being coaxed back if I think it's worth it. So far, though, I'm still seeing a lot of transparent windows, and man, I got sick of those in 2003.
Vista and Windows 7 are about money. Nothing else. XP will be supported till 2014. Why change? Why fix something that isn't broken?
W7 will be better... thanks for the fluff Apple - now we get o reap the benefits versus the over price - overhyped OSX now with so many finger gestures you'll be lucky to use/understand how they work for ages (thank goodness it's on "silky smooth glass" YIPPY!!!)
Vista runs fast (turn off AERO), and has yet to slow down like XP always did after a few months. Sticking with XP is like sticking with a rotary phone.
UAC is annoying when you first set things up, but after that it doesn't pop up that often.
Regarding Windows 7, MS took a lot of flack for taking so long to release Vista and vowed to ship a replacement within 3 years... by 2010.
As for the reviews, was it not strange when a lot of those reviewers got p tin a room with VISTA named something different. Then they all suddenly liked it?
As for Ran for it? In 2008 was good for mac they got up to 2.6 million Macs shipped. In comparison for the same Q4 sales HP 11,900,000, Dell 9,666.000, Other 32,180,000 Total PC sales 65,587,000.
Microsoft Q4, 2008 shows 180,000,000 Vista Licenses shipped to date. Up from 80-90 million mark of Q4-2007. So yes Vista is doing pretty good despite, urban legend.
MUI - multi-language support
4 OS Virtualization out of the box (yes run four OS's for the price of one...)
Bitlocker for hard drive encryption
Better management tools for deployment
Those are four good reasons to upgrade not including the productivity gains. Same up-take (Windows 2000 to Windows XP Pro)... business does it especially when your support for hotfixes goes bye bye and all the application vendors finally get on board.
Yes, there remain problems with Vista this first two years, but nowhere near the problems that remained within the second year of XP's release. They put out XP SP1 eventually etc. This time, they've made the SP''s once every 6 months and the new o/s releases once every 30 months.
To those who argue they're just small businessmen who want something that works and only want an o/s and two or three pieces of software - I don't understand why you just don't buy an Ubuntu workstation to run your co's dozen stations - if that's how you define your firm's tech competitiveness, baby, you got all you need with Ubuntu which comes equipped with Firefox and OpenOffice and is one damn fine system. You really do not belong making serious capital decisions this century about Intel / AMD / Nvidia et al hardware, let alone Microsoft / Apple / Google et al software - you don't need all that fancy stuff. Whatever you do, don't forget the fanciest stuff of all - buying your pre-builds through either of the three OEM's who are supplying you. Those three outfits, Mr. Small Businessman, understand you better than you understand yourself and have been taking you to the cleaners daily for years. Yes, those three. Just saying.
I'm just curious: in say early 2010 when it ships (my guess) -- will everyone be talking about anything from Android version 3 to some $149 netbook with linux to ??
In other words, as MSFT tactically improves the product, are they missing the next thing? (And yes, I know someday Azure will ship too).
It just seems a lot of years/dollars for stuff that seems pretty pragmatic.
To me, Vista feels like XP all dolled up and shiny. What I hope is that Windows 7 is not a revision or an adaptation of Vista, but that it's literally like a whole new operating system. Please, Microsoft, don't rush it... start from the ground up, pour ridiculous amounts of time and money into research and development, and give us an operating system we can count on.