String theory could be ruled out by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a particle accelerator scheduled to open by the end of 2007, a new study says. The finding offers a new approach for testing this potential "theory of everything", a goal that has so far proven elusive.
According to string theory, particles like electrons and photons are actually tiny, vibrating strings. The beauty of the theory is that it accounts for all of the known forces – including gravity, which the standard model of physics does not. But its critics have complained that there is essentially no way to test it.
Strong evidence for string theory could come from the observation of short-lived, mini black holes at the LHC (see Watching God play dice: The Large Hadron Collider). But the chance of their appearing is extremely small, so a failure to see them would not be a death blow for the theory.
In 2006, string theorist Allan Adams of MIT in Cambridge, US, and others offered a more promising check. They showed that some particle collisions could reveal whether certain fundamental assumptions underlying string theory are wrong.
Now, another team has shown that the energies needed to reveal such effects are achievable at the LHC, which is being built in Geneva, Switzerland. The team was led by Jacques Distler of the University of Texas in Austin, US.
One of string theory's assumptions comes from Einstein's theory of relativity – that the speed of light is the same for all observers, a principle called Lorentz invariance.
This principle – and three others underlying string theory – determine how strongly particles called W bosons, which transmit the weak nuclear force, interact.
If these interactions are below the strength calculated by Distler's team, it would signal that one of the assumptions built into string theory is incorrect and that therefore string theory itself is wrong, the researchers say.
"They did a very important thing," Adams told New Scientist.
If string theory does seem to be ruled out, physicists will have to find another theory of everything that can explain the LHC observations. "If we see these violations, people will start working very feverishly on some sort of alternative that will produce these violations," Distler told New Scientist.
That alternative may turn out to be a theory called loop quantum gravity, which posits that space itself is quantised into tiny chunks. Some physicists argue that loop quantum gravity does not satisfy Lorentz invariance. "So that's one possible direction people might go," Distler says.
Although the test could in principle rule out string theory if violations are found, both Distler and Adams suspect that the results will turn out to respect the four assumptions, leaving string theory as a viable candidate for the theory of everything.
Quantum World - Learn more about a weird world in our comprehensive special report.
Journal reference: Physical Review Letters (in press)
By J
Thu Mar 27 11:54:19 GMT 2008
This comment has been found to be in breach of our terms of use and has been removed.REPORT | REPLY
By Britt
Mon Mar 31 21:01:18 BST 2008
I dont think it is worth the risk of playing with something that you dont know enough about .The out come could be catastrophic.There are to many unknown variables.This research and future test involving this particle collider is all based on a theory.You are trying to prove a subatomic reality using an inferior medium .I wish I could be more positive in my response;but from what I read about this proposed experiment with this collider it seems like too dangerous an experiment .I am not a practicing catholic;but reading recently about this eperiment with this collider made me think of the book of daniel:IN THE END OF DAYS THE MYSTERY OF GOD WILL BE REVEALED;PEOPLE WILL WISH FOR DEATH BECAUSE OF THE HORROR.If a black hole is created there will be nothing we can do.Ther are some things we dont need to know ,just under stand.By Matt
Tue Apr 01 07:48:12 BST 2008
Hah. Dont believe it. There is an extremely small chance that a black hole can be created. Oh, and why are you reading this if you're a religious person? its blasphemy.By Reid
Sat Apr 19 01:15:09 BST 2008
This is not a laughing matter Matt. You have said your self that there is a small chance that a black hole could be created. Do we want to leave the FATE OF MANKIND to chance! I am very intrigued by this particle accelerator myself and would be tempted to say, go for it, just out of curiosity but come on now, this is as serious as it gets. Our fate will be on the razors edge if these scientists go ahead with the experiment. One question for all of you; Would you risk the lives of your children or parents to satisfy your curiosity? On a deeper level would you really want to leave the fate of earth and reality as we know it to chance, just to satisfy your curiosity?By J. Reid
Tue Apr 22 00:19:41 BST 2008
P.s.By Kris
Wed Sep 10 02:11:55 BST 2008
Hey our fate is based on chance, in fact we have a greater chance of nuclear warfare or being hit by a meteor. The universe is a risky place a neighboring galixy could go super nova and wipe us out. The fact of the matter is that we need science, having religious beliefs is completly obserd. Religion was invented by man to govern the people in a time before laws how can t be trusted?....pure ignorance.
By Tony
Mon Jul 28 13:41:14 BST 2008
Er.... We're talking subatomic black holes at the LHC nothing like the cosmological black holes that the scaremongering media has mistakenly got hold of. Subatomic black holes are fleeting and low energy but will rpvide good insights into the behaviour of their more powerful cousins There is no risk whatsoever. That's it. So no need for this debate to continue furtherBy Kris
Wed Sep 10 01:48:57 BST 2008
The idea behind the experiment is to expand our knowledge of the universe. We could live blissfully in our tiny planet with no greater knowledge obtained but whats the point? we are corrupt by the influence of different religions and ideology, greater understanding could bring the greater gift of peace and thats one thing that's worth dieing for. If you can't see the greater good turn off your tv and put down ur celebrity magazines.All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.