もう19時か、
2ちゃんねる ■掲示板に戻る■ 全部 1- 最新50 [PR]話し相手はここにいるかも【ASKS?】[PR]  

【百科事典】ウィキペディア第538刷【Wikipedia】

659 :名無しの愉しみ:2008/02/02(土) 17:19:39 ID:???
頑張って英作文してみたよ!
これ書き込んで大丈夫だと思う?

I am a JAWP user. I agree completely with the opinion of Yamamoto Ichiro.

I want to add my point of view. I guess that two communities may have the
difference in the understanding of privacy and freedom of speech. For example,
you can make articles of criminal's name in ENWP. But you can't do it in JAWP.
Also you can't make the link to such articles of ENWP in JAWP. Because we
think that it is the serious violation of privacy.

And we think that disclosing the real name of another user is serious violations
of privacy. And it is violations of freedom of speech, I think, because fear to it
make enough reason to give up contributing. I know, Aphaia apologized to the user
whose real name have been disclosed and the user may forgive her. JAWP community
decided to block her for three months. I have no strong opinion it is best decision or not.
But I don't think it is very unfair, because JAWP may need it not to make someone
who threaten to disclose private information again and force to forgive themselves
violation (I don't think Aphaia did so. I'm talking about probable bad influence).

I don't oppose to confirm Aphaia. However, when someone say "Because the blocking in
JAWP is not fair", I feel you don't share our respect to privacy and freedom of speech.

149 KB [ 2ちゃんねる 3億PV/日をささえる レンタルサーバー \877/2TB/100Mbps]

■ おすすめ2ちゃんねる 開発中。。。 by FOX ★
このスレを見ている人はこんなスレも見ています。(ver 0.20)
ちくり板住人がWikipediaを弄るスレ 第6刷 [ちくり裏事情]

新着レスの表示

掲示板に戻る 全部 前100 次100 最新50
名前: E-mail (省略可) :


read.cgi ver 05.0.4.9 2007/06/21
FOX ★ DSO(Dynamic Shared Object)