上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]moistowelettes 133ポイント134ポイント  (109子コメント)

I think this sub is running out of subs

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 9ポイント10ポイント  (27子コメント)

you try finding new subreddits that have 500+ subscribers and that haven't been featured before in /r/SubredditOfTheDay whilst also having enough substance in them to make an interesting read and then making sure that you have a post for every day of every month in the year... its hard man

[–]XENOVICE 54ポイント55ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because what you do here is so important. That's how you rationalize promoting this? Jesus.

[–]Dominator27 49ポイント50ポイント  (19子コメント)

Why don't you at least not promote nazis. It can't be that hard to do a quick scan of that sub and conclude these people are racist nazis and then move on to another eligible subreddit.

Also Why should racist bigots get a award because your too lazy to find non racist sexist subreddits?

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 15ポイント16ポイント  (80子コメント)

When we feature subs you don't like that doesn't mean we're running out of subs, it means we're featuring subs you don't like. The srotd team is a diverse group of individuals each with their own interests and style. That is why we're able to select a new interesting subreddit every single day.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 142ポイント143ポイント  (38子コメント)

Yeah, that's the problem with Nazis.

Not the mass genocide and ethnic cleansing.

No, it's the fact that they have different opinions is the REAL issue!

[–]quaerere_veritatem 5ポイント6ポイント  (4子コメント)

Not Nazis you slandering asshole

[–]SpectreOfLenin 27ポイント28ポイント  (2子コメント)

[TRIGGERED]

[–]quaerere_veritatem 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Lol, this entire sub is [TRIGGERED]; because of an alt right sub.

[–]PurpleKneesocks 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, the subreddit that hails themselves as national socialists is in no way affiliated with the nazionalesozialisten party, guy.

[–]XENOVICE 62ポイント63ポイント  (9子コメント)

You're promoting hate.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 3ポイント4ポイント  (5子コメント)

France excluding non-French = Hate. France becoming non-French = Love.

[–]XENOVICE 14ポイント15ポイント  (4子コメント)

Culture is a fluid thing, always has been. Accomplishing this thing you call 'exclusion' involves inflicting mass suffering on people. We can't roll back time.

Culture is also what you do, how you speak with others, and who you speak with. The modern state of those things is irrevocably different from anything that came before it. Even if you were to force an 'exclusion' (as previous authoritarian regimes have tried, to horror), it would lead to an entirely new form of culture bearing even less resemblance to your fantasy of the past than before.

This desire is self defeating but is propagated by power hungry people willing to do the violence while you lay around shitposting 'remove kebab' memes.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

You can't make a German into a Japanese person. No matter how long he lives in Japan he will never be Japanese.

Once the French are a minority in France it isn't France anymore.

[–]XENOVICE 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

None of those things are monolithic. There are more Americas then there are Americans. Initiating violence against innocent people on behalf of an abstraction is indefensible, and an ideology that promotes racial supremacy promotes racial violence.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why does nearly all of the world promote racial violence by keeping their nations the same?

[–]scobes 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

When was the last time you visited France?

[–]Myne1001 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

White people? Showing self interest? On MY reddit???

OH MY GOD THIS IS HATE SPEECH LITERALLY NAZIS! OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN!

[–]mavriksfan11 45ポイント46ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, the literal top post of the sub is:

We must strengthen the Indoctrination Stations for the goyim children so they can never get a leg up on us again

So it's anti-Semitic...seems pretty close to what Nazis were...but who knows for sure. I mean they aren't German.

[–]Jade_Wind 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

The discrepancy is that altright is an actual fascist /white nationalist group that hates everyone except white people on the premise that everyone except themselves leech off of white wealth.

They're the political version of redpill, which is probably the biggest joke on the planet with no punchline.

A lot of them are wealthy-ish white dudes with nothing to do with their money but spend it on themselves or store it away, which is ironically the biggest leech-esque thing they could do, as it benefits nobody.

So no, they arent just white people with self interest, they're a bunch of dudes with a bunch of time on their hands and enough edge to cut the world in half.

[–]Hell_Libertine 53ポイント54ポイント  (6子コメント)

Shame on you for promoting hatred. What's next? You're going to link subs promoting ISIS? You're promoting fucking Neo-Nazis so that won't surprise me.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Is there a sub that promotes ISIS? Please point me in it's direction. It would make for a fun feature.

[–]RedPillDessert 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well there's always r/Islam...

I kid.... I kid...... ;)

Seriously, your adoption to free speech is rare and very commendable.

[–]Dominator27 20ポイント21ポイント  (17子コメント)

remember moderator when you give out this award you give these people a voice, however they don't deserve a voice for their racist propaganda that takes advantage of insecure whites nor a award for it

Edit: Protest Subreddit is up /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 5ポイント6ポイント  (16子コメント)

Your belief that we should not give a voice to groups you disagree with indicates that you severely lack a proper education on the perils of fascism.

[–]Dominator27 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

Your right. I guess nazis should have a voice on the internet no matter how much I Hate them.

However I don't believe it's your job nor Reddit's job to give them that voice.Let them find a way to promote themselves

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is not my job. This is my hobby. And I will do with my hobby what I think is best.

[–]Dominator27 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ok then

Edit: fuck you I found out about your bias

[–]survivalsong 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Refusing to give a platform to fascism is literally fascism.

[–]TwerkersOfTheWorld 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hahahaha you're calling the people fascist who are telling nazis to fuck off, and not the people who are promoting ethnic cleansing? Your hobby sucks if it is helping to give voice to literal fucking nazis, and you and the mod team should really be ashamed of yourselves

[–]OverlordXenu 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

White supremacy doesn't deserve a voice. It isn't an opinion that adds value to a conversation. You don't have to give them a platform, and you shouldn't.

[–]Fastball14 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fascism was defeated by overwhelming military force. The victors write the history books.

[–]PurpleKneesocks 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

And the fascists committed genocide

[–]MaiPhet 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

They can talk amongst their damn selves, it's not anyone's responsibility to promote and publicize them on their behalf. It's childishly naive.

My family doesn't celebrate the canvas we gave neo nazis in the 80's when they shot up and swastika'd our home.

[–]CrushCoalMakeDiamond 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Does this guy even know what fascism means? Hint: It doesn't mean "censorship"

[–]Fubby2 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Reddit. The only place where forced diversity is a sin, until you are supporting Nazis.

[–]Dominator27 61ポイント62ポイント  (15子コメント)

What the Fuck! The Alt right gets featured it's like r/theredpill all over again. First Furry porn then a bunch of KKK endorsers who believe nonsense like the "white genocide" conspiracy. A bunch of neo-nazis (with pepes) don't deserve this reward!

Edit: I've created a protest Subreddit! To protest clear mod bias and giving a voice to some of the most digusting people on reddit /r/goodsubredditoftheday

[–]itsnotlupus 53ポイント54ポイント  (17子コメント)

I see this sub is exploring the fine line between being morally neutral and being morally bankrupt.

Will they find the line? Stay tuned.

[–]SocialNationalism 5ポイント6ポイント  (16子コメント)

Lines in morality are a social construct.

[–]RedPillDessert -1ポイント0ポイント  (15子コメント)

Nope it's objective. Destroying whites will be bad for the world, objectively in practically every sense.

[–]CantSayISaidSo 47ポイント48ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'd like to put a huge target on my back and let all you fascist fucks know that myself and my two very white, very Anglo-descended brothers have all procreated with women of color.

Death to your vision of America. I'm proud to be doing my part.

[–]RuthBuzzisback 214ポイント215ポイント  (172子コメント)

Are you fucking kidding me..?

[–]YopperApe 84ポイント85ポイント  (79子コメント)

Wow.

Just wow.

I can't even...

[–]Agastopia 87ポイント88ポイント  (78子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

I see you're new to the alt right.

to demonize all Jew's just seems too similar to me to blacks demonizing all whites for the success of many.

Are whites actively undermining blacks? No? Then it's not comparable.

Listen, I'm sure good jews exist. I mean there's the color of crime guy and Paul Gottfried. Outside of that though? Zip. Nada. Zilch.

encourage you to look for exceptions. I tried for a long time to find "good jew" exceptions but consistently they would start jewing somehow and come out in favour of everything we're against. Like the "conservative" jews who ends up being in favour of muslim immigration. Or "libertarian" jews who end up being in favour of importing mestizos. Or "free speech" jews who end up being in favour of political correctness. It never fails, they always jew you in the end.

I can agree there is theoretically a capacity for certain jews to contribute in a positive manner. However it is like finding a unicorn pretty much. And the chance he's gonna jew you and undermine your entire movement is magnitudes higher. Hence for our own preservation we can't really risk anything.

[–]YopperApe 45ポイント46ポイント  (59子コメント)

Remember guys, they aren't racist

Yes we are. That's one of the defining features of the alt-right, that we're racist. Where did you get the idea that it was otherwise?

[–]Agastopia 71ポイント72ポイント  (35子コメント)

At least you admit it

[–]YopperApe 26ポイント27ポイント  (34子コメント)

Now that that's out of the way, what was your point?

[–]SpectreOfLenin 53ポイント54ポイント  (31子コメント)

Are you racist because you have penile issues or inadequacy issues?

[–]survivalsong 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love this attitude that if you just front up about being racist people will be stumped somehow. Like if you own it you'll take all the power out of it. We already know that alt-right is built on unreconstructed old-school racism.

[–]RushofBlood52 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, that was basically it.

[–]TotesMessenger 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]Mulche_ 26ポイント27ポイント  (1子コメント)

Remember guys, "that's racist" isn't a counter-argument.

[–]_The_Burn_ 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Although racism is a cardinal sin to most, within the Alt Right, it is irrelevant. There is a dichotomy between the standards of morality.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

...well what is your counter? And remember: not every member speaks for the group. Why don't you target Israeli subs or groups for being the most "racist" country on the planet. They do ethnic DNA test for entry and have a machine gun mounted border wall, and take in no "refugees." Pointing out the hypocrisy and subversion of the Jewish tribe is a core principle in the Alt Right.

[–]flint97 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Counter to what? The claim that this guy has only met stereotypical jews? We are not clairvoyant. And why should random jews who quite possibly do not even live in Israel be forced to answer for the racism there?

[–]lordthat100188 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why should all nationalists who don't believe in genocide be forced to answer for the holocaust?

[–]baebridge 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because judging someone by their choices is different from judging them by their ethnicity?

[–]Jade_Wind 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Maybe because altright supports fascism and nationalism, as well as an overall hate for anyone who isnt a white neckbeard with a vocabulary that would bore Immanuel Kant.

Edit: also because fuck you that's why.

[–]reactionarytree 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

clutching your pearls is not an argument.

[–]butrosbutrosfunky 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

-( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)╯╲___卐卐卐卐 Don't mind me just walking the mods

[–]Javalavadingdong 23ポイント24ポイント  (83子コメント)

No, grow up and realize people have different opinions than your own.

[–]Agastopia 81ポイント82ポイント  (76子コメント)

White supremacy is awesome!

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬[M] 17ポイント18ポイント  (15子コメント)

No its not.

[–]Agastopia 52ポイント53ポイント  (12子コメント)

I feel like you don't know what subreddit you've made subreddit of the day...

[–]BatMunki┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬ 18ポイント19ポイント  (10子コメント)

wasn't written by me or my choice to post it, if it was I would have not featured it

[–]quaerere_veritatem 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I feel like you are too close minded to realize their points

[–]quaerere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Supremacy is something the Alt Right has tried to deal with; we try to let people know that supremacy is mainly subjective, but it is important that identity and preservation of identity is important. However, the facts do point to European people and East Asian people as creating societies that are objectively better when measuring standards of living, crime rates, and technology. So the argument of supremacy in certain areas is quite legitimate.

[–]Javalavadingdong 23ポイント24ポイント  (38子コメント)

What's so wrong with being proud of your race? Every other race except whites can have pride for their race.

[–]guncha 35ポイント36ポイント  (37子コメント)

Every other race pride is as dumb as white pride.

[–]GodEmperorTrump1488 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

bullshit. You wouldnt dare go up to a black guy with his fist in the air and tell him black power is dumb.

[–]MarcusCamillius 18ポイント19ポイント  (5子コメント)

You should tell that to BLM, la Raza and other racial pride groups. I know you won't, because you only hate White people, and you want us to be individuals while encouraging other groups to have racial solidarity.

[–]guncha 21ポイント22ポイント  (4子コメント)

I will call them dumb if they come here and start arguing that black or hispanic pride is somehow an exception. I will call you dumb too if you keep jumping to conclusions:

because you only hate White people

You capitalized "white"? Really?

[–]quaerere_veritatem 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I do that too, I also capitalize Black

[–]yesididmakeanother 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think capitalizing "white" is kinda gay usually, but if I'm in the middle of a conversation and someone puts "white" in scare quotes because they think race is a social construct and there's no such thing as white people, then I'll capitalize it.

[–]MarcusCamillius 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Lol no you won't. You'll spend your time calling out White people for loving their heritage because you hate White people.

[–]Fastball14 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

White is a proper noun in this context. Capitalization is appropriate.

[–]yesididmakeanother 5ポイント6ポイント  (18子コメント)

Almost no one in the alt right is a white supremacist.

They are many other things, but not white supremacists.

[–]penguinseatsocks 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

this narrative has been the absolute, hands-down stupidest one following the election. "don't be mad because your candidate lost!" really? are we voting for the next fucking dorito flavor?

[–]BrunchBoi 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Fuck you. The alt right are neo nazis and they should not be given a broader platform.

[–]Dominator27 46ポイント47ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hey anyone who happens to read this. Altright got featured because the writer is a bias mod who used his power to promote his garbage beliefs. He posts in mutiple pro-Trump subreddits and rants about SJWs and his comments here clearly prove he agrees with them. I thought Trumpers would be againist bias mods considering how much they complained about r/politics! SAD! This guy let his personal bias chose who to nominate for the award SROTD. Oh and his avatar is a nazi anime girl [the girl is pulled straight from the post] damning proof right there that this mod is with the altright (altright loves memes and anime) but cleary altright is not nazis of course not, just "racist realists" or "people who take pride in being white". We need to stand up to this mod's corruption of this subreddit and how he rigged the system to get nazis featured on this subreddit because he is one. We will start a movement and start a new Subreddit!!! /r/goodsubredditoftheday!

Hey mods don't remove this unless you want to be a facist! Because that's how free speech works!/s

[–]nametheoccupation 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

Holy shit fuck reddit hope the moderators of this sub all choke

[–]Dominator27 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

"But But But... if you don't let us feature fascists your a fascist In fact it's our job to feature nazis" -moderator and writer of this post

[–]-Lautrec- 19ポイント20ポイント  (1子コメント)

But as we all know; Reddit is extremely liberally biased. Ultimately we will be banned if for no other reason than we’ve become too popular.

Reddit is so liberally biased that every second /r/all submission comes from the-donald

[–]Lord_Kek 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It would be every post but they had to nerf r/all.

[–]Lokismoke 34ポイント35ポイント  (5子コメント)

Reddit's very own NatSoc community.

I take it you mean National Socialist community?! TF?! That's "Alt Right" in the same way the sounds of a man stuffing a pile of baby gerbils into a hollowed out watermelon is "Alt Rock."

[–]cxl61 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the Nazi description is somewhat accurate, even though not all people on that sub are at the Hitler level of racist. (These groups were the first to call themselves alt-right, while the term only more recently came to denote the more moderate pro-Trump movements that primarily oppose the political establishment)

[–]081624 19ポイント20ポイント  (2子コメント)

No, that is alt right. Ok not all alt right people are national socialists but they are all racists, and that's the entire point. You just think alt right isn't about racism because people like Hillary Clinton told you it's about racism, and redditors have this Pavlovian response where whenever Hillary says something you assume it's false and call her out of touch.

[–]Meatssacre 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

What the actual fuck?

[–]Dominator27 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

The moderator is a member of the/supports /r/altright so he featured it

[–]Shitgenstein 5ポイント6ポイント  (4子コメント)

I'm curious for any alt-right users here, I have a question. I will not try to argue against your answer. I will respect your right to have the views which you have.

How do things like "Human Bio-Diversity" and "race realism" differ from concepts like polygenism and scientific racism which are widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

[–]George_Rockwell 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

widely regarded as obsolete since the 19th century?

This has only happened because the culture has demanded it.

See my additional sources here

[–]CertifiedRabbi 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's pretty obvious that human biodiversity and race realism are just politically correct euphemisms for scientific racism. The only reason that we use those terms is to put people at ease because modern sensibilities have been so skewed towards automatically and violently rejecting White bigotry. But the idea that scientific racism has been thoroughly debunked is a talking point that anti-racist liberals like to spout in order to discredit our ideas. And just because certain aspects of 19th century and early 20th century scientific racism were nonsense, that doesn't mean that everything that they espoused was nonsense or that more recent scientific racism is just a rehash of discredited ideas.

Reality also isn't a popularity contest. I could be the only person in the entire world that believes that not all racial groups are equally intelligent and civilized, but that wouldn't mean that I'm wrong. Yes, we know that the scientific and academic community completely despises us, but that isn't because our ideas are BS. Our views simply aren't politically correct.

Eugenics is a perfect example of a completely valid scientific idea falling out of fashion simply because it offends modern liberal sensibilities. Not only is it possible to improve the human gene pool through genetic screening, embryo selection, cloning, genetic engineering, selective breeding, polygamy, artificial insemination, et cetera, but it's absolutely vital to the long-term health of our species and our environment.

It's widely known in environmentalist circles that human overpopulation is the root cause of most environmental issues. Everything from climate change to overfishing is mostly caused by too many people living on this planet. So, if the human population needs to be dramatically reduced in order to fix this problem (which most scientists and environmentalists are hesitant to publicly acknowledge because they don't want to be accused of being evil Nazis), then eugenics is obviously the most logical solution to this problem, because if you have to dramatically reduce the human population then obviously it just makes sense to select for the best and the brightest.

Who wouldn't want to live in an environmentally sustainable society that had a guaranteed income, an army of AI robots (but not so smart that they pose a threat to us) to take care of the dirty work, and a beautiful and healthy citizenry comprised of Mensa members? We'll soon have the scientific know-how to make that neo-Nazi utopia a reality, but what we lack is the political will to implement it (thanks to the progressive Left). The Alt-Right exists to solve this problem.

Dysgenics is also a massive problem that's being completely ignored because the solutions lead you down a path towards the Fourth Reich.

Eugenics has to be one of the most important and powerful ideas in all of human history, but it's being suppressed simply because it reeks of Nazism. So, while the progressive Left just loves to claim that the conservative religious Right is getting in the way of scientific and human progress, when it comes to eugenics it's the liberal Left that's preventing our species from making the next major leap forward.

You can tell that the scientific community is completely terrified of new developments in genetic research bolstering our racist weltanschauung. Once we get a better idea of which genes are responsible for human behavior, we'll finally be able to solidly prove that some racial groups are inherently superior to other racial groups. You can also tell that the scientific community is extremely nervous about discovering that the genes that are responsible for intelligence won't be evenly distributed throughout the various "population groups" (the politically correct term for race). Acknowledging that racial and class differences have a genetic basis will completely undermine the central pillar of modern progressive ideology.

Scientists like James Watson and Hans Eysenck weren't quacks. They were treated like heretics for daring to dissent from modern progressive orthodoxy.

If you want to learn more about modern scientific racism, then you should check out people like Stephen Hsu [1][2][3]. He's allowed to get away with espousing racist, Nazi-ish ideas because he isn't White, and because he's very careful to moderate his views by paying lip service to progressive egalitarian ideology.

[–]roflocalypselol 17ポイント18ポイント  (5子コメント)

Okay since apparently this is happening... the Alt Right as defined by its creators is a racial awareness movement. The alt-right as coopted by Breitbart, The_donald, Milo, etc. is not. They just wanted a way to say non-establishment conservatives and well...picked a confusing label. The Alt Right considers those people 'alt light' or still 'normies'.

[–]cxl61 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

The sub featured here is more of that actual white nationalist movement, compared to that less extreme Trump movement that's also used the label.

[–]roflocalypselol 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Trump movement, etc. simply coopted the name without researching it much, I think. T_D is very inclusive. The real Alt Right includes white identitarians and other race realists, but only some are actual NatSoc.

[–]cxl61 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Definitely. T_D will accept pretty anyone who supports Trump (they love highlighting token minority supporters in that sub), while the true and less visible alt-right usually do believe that racially homogeneous societies are most successful (and consider minorities to be "them" compared to "us" being white people).

[–]CuckNorris1 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Alt light is still fairly race realist, they just dog whistle more and don't write about it as clearly.

[–]roflocalypselol 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some are, many aren't. I'd say most subscribe to cultural explanations that correlate with race, rather than genetic determination.

[–]EagleDarkX 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

What would a website be without it's own NatSoc community AKA Nazi's?

Wait, I know that one, a better place to be.

[–]waystogetaround 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

Wow..., Oh my, the poor naive souls over at SRD and other metasureddits are going to have hard time to even.

These are the people who are convinced that the folks at /r/The_Donald are literally(for real) Hitler 2.0, wonder what that makes us.

[–]Myne1001 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I commented this on an article about Breitbart around the time Bannon joined the Trump campaign

"You think Breitbart is bad? Just you wait until you go further down the rabbit hole. Then you'll be thinking Breitbart is moderate"

[–]picassopolo 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nice job promoting hate speech!

[–]jereddit 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is this for real? That sub is some stormfront shit. It should be fucking quarantined.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 17ポイント18ポイント  (25子コメント)

I wouldn't exactly call us a NatSoc community. Are there NatSoc's who consider themselves Alt Right? Sure. But there are many other groups, as well.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 15ポイント16ポイント  (18子コメント)

I was basing that title on the fact that Hitler and Mussolini are featured on the topbar of /r/altright.

Don't take anything that I said in the feature as a description of the alt right in general. Everything that I wrote is intended to be a description of your sub and it's interpretation of the alt right.

[–]GreatApeNiggy 9ポイント10ポイント  (15子コメント)

Not an issue. I was just pointing out that the Alt Right is a spectrum. You've got NatSocs and even people further right than that on one end and still others on the other end who think that NatSoc ideology is counter-productive. Ultimately we try to give a nod to all factions without judgement, which is why Jared Taylor is also on the banner, a person who some consider weak on the JQ.

[–]woodrowwilsonlonglit.statseven.com 6ポイント7ポイント  (11子コメント)

That makes sense. Well, if I could do it over again I'd give it a different title but there's already way too many comments to delete this thread.

[–]citizen_beyond 17ポイント18ポイント  (21子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity.

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens. They view neurological uniformity as the null hypothesis, despite the fact that it is not seen in any other species. They assume it to be true until proven otherwise, and yet they refuse to consider evidence disproving it. They are analogous to creationists who refuse to look at fossil evidence.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State. All problems in the world are to be ultimately solved by the State. Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before. But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 41ポイント42ポイント  (16子コメント)

Liberal progressivism has become the dominant religion of modernity

/r/im14andthisisdeep

It is a non-theistic sect of Christianity along the Calvinist line.

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Did you just put together a bunch of words that would make you sound smart?

And a pernicious and well adapted meme it is, for it advertises itself as rational and non-theistic. It's most devout followers will not even consider alternative viewpoints because they label them as "pseudo-science". They refuse to even look at them.

Ah, yes.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

And yet they have many non-scientific views like their belief in neurological uniformity across all diverse sub-populations of homo sapiens.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

I know the whole IQ thing is a big sticking point for Nazis, but the difference in IQ between white people and non-white people is not large enough to completely exclude any chance of being as good or better than the average white person.

You're acting like the mental function between a black person and a white person is as wide as it is between a human and a dog.

The smartest, functioning dog is not smarter than the dumbest functioning human.

Whereas the smartest functioning black person is absolutely smarter than the dumbest functioning white person.

That's all you need to know with regards to the IQ gap is that it can be socially engineered.

They have replaced original sin with White privilege/guilt, and their God is the State

The fuck?

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means.

And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

Their religious vision is a peaceful multicultural democratic utopia. Of course, such a society has never existed before.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

But this is of little consequence for a devout liberal progressive. The vision is more important than reality itself.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

[–]SocialNationalism 6ポイント7ポイント  (8子コメント)

r/Iam14andthisisdeep

r/notanargument

A non-theistic set of a theist ideology...

Christianity isn't necessarily theistic, it could be about Jesus' teachings and interpretations of them without believing in his divinity; obviously this is just semantic snark over a thing called a metaphor.

As opposed to White Nationalists who are renown for their openness and willingness to question established norms.

r/notanargument and you're responding to a comment about a meme with stereotypes about a group of people. Also, *renowned.

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

Assertion without evidence.

First of all, not every person on the left is in agreement as to what white privilege means. And secondly not every person on the left wants a state.

NAxALT, bro.

Neither has a successful ethnocentric state, doesn't stop you from trying.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

How far down do you have to bend to suck your dick that much?

The liberal mind in a nutshell.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 15ポイント16ポイント  (7子コメント)

Assertion without evidence

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

NAxALT, bro

I have a tip for white nationalists who want to make arguments.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

An example of a successful ethnocentric state isn't hard to find e.g. the USA before 1960.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories?

Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets?

Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung.

SUCH SUCCESS.

MUCH PARADISE.

[–]SocialNationalism 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

If there are black people who are smarter than white people and white people who are dumber than black people, than it is self-evident that conditions can be changed to account for the difference in IQ.

No... Unless you are including eugenics.

Don't throw out rhetoric and logical fallacies and expect to receive serious responses.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

Oh you mean when children were getting thrown into factories? Or do you mean during the depression when people were starving in the streets? Or maybe you mean during the 1800s when miners were dying in their 30s from black lung. SUCH SUCCESS. MUCH PARADISE.

Not an argument.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 8ポイント9ポイント  (3子コメント)

No...

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Ironic. Also, not an argument.

It wasn't meant to be an argument, you dullard.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

There's nothing to argue.

It was just facts.

Deal with it.

[–]SocialNationalism 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well, fuck me. Ironclad logic there.

Finally you get something right.

It was meant to be a reference to the fact your arguments are shit.

Not an argument.

It was just facts.

Asking dumb questions then calling them facts... that's not an argument.

[–]George_Rockwell 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm enjoying watching a /u/SocialNationalism go at it with a /u/SpectreOfLenin

Truly 2016 is the best timeline

[–]SocialNationalism 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

ikr seeing this shit is like bait to me

[–]George_Rockwell 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Any different between races is negligible to the point that social conditions can make up for them.

You're gonna want to hold onto your tendies for this one:

Humans can be genetically categorized into five racial groups, corresponding to traditional races. http://pritchardlab.stanford.edu/publications/pdfs/RosenbergEtAl02.pdf

Genetic analysis "supports the traditional racial groups classification." http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

"Human genetic variation is geographically structured" and corresponds with race. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622

Oral bacteria can be used to determine race. http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans. http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

96-97% of whites have no African ancestry. http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans.3.html

97% of Whites have no black ancestry whatsoever. http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-white-black-a-murky-distinction-grows-still-murkier/

There was "minimal gene flow" between archaic Europeans and Asians. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning. http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf

Human intelligence is highly heritable. http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

The average African IQ is estimated at 79. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100. http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf

The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing. http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB115040765329081636

Intelligence has a 40-50% genetic basis. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

IQ is 75% heritable among Whites. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

More diverse neighborhoods have lower social cohesion. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2013/11/paradox-diverse-communities/7614/

Diversity increases psychotic experiences. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity increases social adversity. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

A 10% increase in diversity doubles the chance of psychotic episodes. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/201/4/282.abstract?etoc

Diversity reduces voter registration, political efficacy, charity, and number of friendships. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Ethnic diversity reduces happiness and quality of life. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x/abstract;jsessionid=279C92A7EB0946BBA63D62937FC832A9.f04t03

Diversity reduces trust, civic participation, and civic health. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/?page=full

Ethnocentrism is rational, biological, and genetic in origin. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1262.abstract

Ethnic diversity harms health for hispanics and blacks. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300787

Babies demostrate ethnocentrism before exposure to non-whites. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01138.x/full

Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~axe/research/AxHamm_Ethno.pdf

Diversity primarily hurts the dominant ethnic group. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10640-012-9619-6

Ethnic diversity within 80 meters of a person reduces social trust. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/130251172/Dinesen_S_nderskov_Ethnic_Diversity_and_Social_Trust_Forthcoming_ASR.pdf

Ethnic diversity directly reduces strong communities. https://www.msu.edu/~zpneal/publications/neal-diversitysoc.pdf

Ethnically homogenous neighborhoods are beneficial for health. https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/living-ethnically-homogenous-area-boosts-health-minority-seniors

Diversity in American cities correlates with segregation. http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-most-diverse-cities-are-often-the-most-segregated/

Races are extended families. Ethnocentrism is genetically rational. http://www.amazon.com/The-Ethnic-Phenomenon-Pierre-Berghe/dp/0275927091

It is evolutionary rational to be friends with someone genetically similar to you. http://www.livescience.com/46791-friends-share-genes.html

Racism and nationalism are rational and evolutionary advantageous strategies. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/16/3/7.html

Homogeneous polities have less crime, less civil war, and more altruism. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

States with little diversity have more democracy, less corruption, and less inequality. http://www.theindependentaustralian.com.au/node/57

There is extensive evidence people prefer others who are genetically similar. http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/n&n 2005-1.pdf

[–]SpectreOfLenin 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

None of that dispels what the core of my arguments are; and frankly there is quite a lot of assumption going on here.

Assuming that I'm in favor of mass, unregulated migration. I'm not.

Assuming that I said there is no biological difference between races. I didn't. I said that if there is a difference it is negligible with that persons conditions.

And you're assuming I think people are naturally intercultural. I didn't.

I openly acknowledge that people tend toward their own culture. What I have said is that it is more beneficial to us if we base our society off cooperation between peoples rather than forceful separation of cultures

If you don't want mass migration, get rid of the conditions that cause it. Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

Those have always been the core of my arguments. What you typed is just noise.

[–]George_Rockwell 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

A society of 70 IQ people simply will not achieve what one made up of 100 IQ people will. Ever.

Like Capitalists in Africa owning another nations people's production and keeping wages below starvation. Like global warming which is causing drought and flooding. Like intervention which is radicalizing Muslims and causing masses of refugees to flee their countries.

I think I can agree with almost all of this, actually.

[–]citizen_beyond 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

Liberal Progressives often resort to Lewontin's fallacy and ad hominem attacks when their religious views are questioned.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 27ポイント28ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's the funniest part about Nazis.

They claim to be scientific but all the shit that comes out of their mouths are logical fallacies.

"MUH STATISTICS"

"MUH ETHNOSTATE"

"DAE RELIGION?!"

[–]thorneedsahaircut 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn, this is an actual physical form of autism

[–]quaerere_veritatem 10ポイント11ポイント  (17子コメント)

The backlash this is getting is absurd. Liberals are extremely dogmatic egalitarians who believe all races evolved to have the same talents. This isn't just non-intuitive, it's scientifically incorrect. Many liberals claim to be atheists that follow the science, however, they project their egalitarian desires/fantasies/RELIGION on the world by slandering great scientists that, for example, study race and IQ differences. The Alt Right does not claim to be a group of NatSoc, it is a race aware, race realist group that understands and wishes to preserve the uniqueness of White identity. There are some supremacists in the Alt Right. It would be impossible for such a movement to prevent entry of such people (even if they even wanted to). If you have a problem with identity politics, then make sure to direct your anger at nearly ONE THOUSAND + other non-white groups out there, rather than the first white one you come across.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 22ポイント23ポイント  (15子コメント)

The backlash this is getting is absurd. Liberals are extremely dogmatic egalitarians who believe all races evolved to have the same talents. This isn't just non-intuitive, it's scientifically incorrect.

Name one thing a white person can do that a black person somewhere can't also do.

I'll be waiting.

Many liberals claim to be atheists that follow the science, however, they project their egalitarian desires/fantasies/RELIGION on the world by slandering great scientists that, for example, study race and IQ differences.

Ah, see I was under the impression that "same talents" meant that a black person and white person can have the same skill set.

But in Nazi fantasy world it means statistical difference in average IQ.

LOGIC!

The Alt Right does not claim to be a group of NatSoc, it is a race aware, race realist group that understands and wishes to preserve the uniqueness of White identity.

Considering the majority of white people don't identify as Alt-Right doesn't that means the white identity doesn't involve your ideology?

Oh dear. Did you fuck up?

If you have a problem with identity politics, then make sure to direct your anger at nearly ONE THOUSAND + other non-white groups out there, rather than the first white one you come across.

Oh I see, so the problem isn't being against identity politics, the problem is being against the wrong type of identity politics.

Again. LOGIC!

[–]survivalsong 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I admire your patience dealing with these pseudo-intellectual dorks.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 6ポイント7ポイント  (11子コメント)

Well, don't you bring a special type of idiocy to the table...

"Name one thing a white person can do that a black person can't also do"

-This is called NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) and it's a non argument. Oh look, you figured it out all by yourself but still didn't edit your first question...hmmm... but i will still oblige: Virtually every advanced theoretical mathematical, engineering, and physical principle was thought of by a White man, so we will never know if Blacks could have ever figured it out by themselves... but I'll leave you with this: Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived! Meanwhile every other culture did except aboriginals, pigmies, and a few others Hmmm

"majority of white people don't identify with alt right doesn't that mean the white identity doesn't involve alt right idiology?"

-You liberals never fail at disguising a slight in a retarded question... this is not worth responding to, and is irreverent.

"so the problem isn't being against identity politics, the problem is being against the wrong type of identity politics"

-No the problem is with liberal hypocrisy spawned by your utter intolerance for science and statistical facts because the facts don't align with your fantasy of equality.

You can use your emotional spewing and cries out of racism, but you will always be wrong as long as you cling to your religion of egalitarianism like a Muslim clings to his Quran.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

This is called NAXALT (Not All X Are Like That) and it's a non argument

If you don't want logically fallacious counter arguments, don't use logically fallacious base arguments.

Don't blame me because you don't know how to make sound arguments.

Virtually every advanced theoretical mathematical, engineering, and physical principle was thought of by a White man, so we will never know if Blacks could have ever figured it out by themselves

Oh so were going from "Black people don't have the same talents as white people" to "Ok some do but white people thought of stuff first!"

LOGIC!

Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived!

Yeah those poor blacks.

Suffering under the crushing tyranny of not being slaves.

Thank god we freed them from the shackles of not being involved in world wars and mass genocide!

Meanwhile every other culture did except aboriginals, pigmies, and a few others Hmmm

I love how you have this view of humanity as if white people were just born with the tools to develop things like rocket science and physics.

These things were developed over time. Not because white people are biologically presupposed to be smart but because of the free flow of information between schools of thought.

Take Japan and China for instance.

On average, Japanese and Chinese people have a higher IQ than white people but it wasn't until after WW2 until China and Japan fully industrialized.

So clearly there is something other than genetics at play.

Access to resources, class mobility and the openness of society is what drives innovation.

Not that fact that your white ass well out of a white womans snatch.

You liberals never fail at disguising a slight in a retarded question... this is not worth responding to, and is irreverent

Well at least you're ideology and my question have something in common!

No the problem is with liberal hypocrisy spawned by your utter intolerance for science and statistical facts because the facts don't align with your fantasy of equality.

First of all, I'm not a liberal.

I know for someone who doesn't understand political science, the idea that the world isn't just "Us" and "liberals", but I'm not a Liberal.

And secondly if you had actually gone to a UNIVERSITY (Run by the JOOZ undoubtedly) you would know that trying to extract biological fact from statistics makes you look like a joke.

Go ahead and write a thesis to the National Bureau of Statistics and try telling them that statistical disproportion is proof of biolocal inferiority and have them laugh your ass out of the building.

Of course I'm sure that's run by the JOOZ as well.

You can use your emotional spewing

Oh diddums, am I being too emotional?

cries out of racism

Cry or not, where there's shit there's flies and you, my friend, are shit.

but you will always be wrong as long as you cling to your religion of egalitarianism like a Muslim clings to his Quran.

Oh BOOO bringing in the Mooslims now?

How about you stop clinging to your statistics like a Jew clings to his gold.

There you go, there's a funnier analogy.

[–]dissdigg 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Imagine being this mad on the internet.

[–]quaerere_veritatem 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

Bahahaha... your idiocy is entertaining, however, I can't keep arguing with a moron; it's a circular conversation and I think third parties have enough to realize where we stand.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

Good discussion! Thanks for leaving your r/altright safe-space to have it, faggot!

[–]Fastball14 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Reported for homophobia and hate speech

[–]MrRaie 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

Sub-Sarahan Africa didn't even have a single two story building or written language on the entire continent until Whites arrived!

What about the Swahili trade coast? Great Zimbabwe? All the stuff in Ethiopia like the Zagwe? The Kingdom of the Kongo?

Fucking Mali? Mansu Musu was so rich that he messed up the economy of the North African Mediterranean when he went on pilgrimage to Mecca.

[–]Spelr 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

lol fuck reddit

fuck this place

[–]ElvishisnotTengwar 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are you fucking joking?

[–]quearere_veritatem 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The people involved on this sub are vicious, vile, close minded. I haven't seen more than a few real arguments against the alt right, just slander and hatred. Rediculous.

[–]Monk_on_Fire 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man, fuck this shit. That subreddit ought to be banned and here you are promoting it.

[–]RedPillDessert 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

Speaking as an alt-right user over there:

Consider than white people in the US have dropped from 90% to 60% of the population in the space of sixty years, and are dropping fast. Less than 50% of US births are now white. The same thing is happening all over Europe too. We are looking at demographic replacement on a vast scale as never seen before.

Personally, I think that's incredibly tragic.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 9ポイント10ポイント  (6子コメント)

The entire reason places like Japan and European countries are successful is because people have career-orientated lifestyles that leave less time to raise a family.

You're paradox is that you want white people to grow in population while maintaining the success that was brought with career-orientated societies.

You can't have it both ways.

[–]RedPillDessert 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't mind NOT growing in population as long as we don't decline and let others overwhelm us instead. White parents can be given incentives to have children. We're almost at two on average, and that's all we need.

[–]SpectreOfLenin 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

White people get the same welfare and benefits from having children as non-white people do.

Incentive clearly isn't the issue.

Standard of living and careers are what cause decline in population.

The same reason the Alt-Right think white people are superior is the same reason their population is declining.

It's the height of absurb.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 1ポイント2ポイント  (7子コメント)

I have no idea what the alt right is. All I know is that White people must become a minority in every country they live. That is love. That is tolerance.

[–]Dominator27 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

The alt right is Basically a bunch of Nazis with their beliefs repackaged as "white identity" and "white nationalism" and with a bunch of 4chan memes.

[–]Daniel_Walker89 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

White nationalism? Nazis? So they want Germany to cease becoming less German? Wow talk about super racists.

[–]Dominator27 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ok then You want Germany white population to stop going down. How do you accomplish this?

[–]Daniel_Walker89 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

No I don't. I want Germans to be a minority in Germany. Fuck the Germans, they deserve to be replaced. And fuck any racist who wants to keep Germany German.

[–]burgeoning_philosoph 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You should probably educate yourself on the alt-right since they just elected the next US president.

[–]Psycho_Logically 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

As the description above entails, the AltRight is an ideology entirely concerned with seeking the truth, and representing empirical reality through their beliefs (unlike modern liberalism or conservatism). As such, if you have a problem with any of their viewpoints, and you think you have the evidence to argue against it, you'll be welcomed for an open and honest discussion (but then laughed at when you're wrong).

[–]BeyondTheModel 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Odd, a feel like this subreddit has a foundation that leans in a specific direction.. to the right, perhaps?

[–]gujnh 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The alt-right isn't about epistemic rationality or empiricism. It's entirely possible to believe HBD is empirically accurate but reject their racial-purity value system in favor of liberalism. The alt-right doesn't seem to understand the difference between descriptive (empirical) and normative claims. And, while I think HBD has a good chance of being true (or mostly true, at least), the other major factual beliefs associated with the alt-right are clearly stupid (Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories, etc.)