Thinking Images v.14: Looking for agents not victims in Congo

April 11, 2011 · by David Campbell · photography, politics
The issues brought up in photographing rape survivors are complex and potentially harmful to the subjects. The ways that photography, video and film function as representative media, and the economies and markets within which they are funded, produced, distributed, achieve recognition and ultimately widespread public exposure can mirror in some ways the trauma of sexual violence. #

The dilemma here is that the normal photographic strategies for “giving an issue a face” can lead to a perpetuation of the original trauma. As Aric concludes: #

Publishing names, faces and stories increases the overall reader/viewer engagement with the story. Therefore media pressure will frequently be in the direction of increased disclosure. It also permanently associates a survivor with their trauma in a world where the internet is increasingly available. #

Despite the many stories of rape victims already produced, new work is planned. One example is the “Besieged” project that is pitching for crowd-funded support on Emphas.is. A collaboration between Sarah Elliott, Benedicte Kurzen, Ying Ang, and Agnes Dherbeys, they “have come together for this project to remind the world about the horrors of systematic rape in Eastern Congo.” I am not arguing for or against support for their project, though I have reservations about the assumptions linking visibility to political action that are behind the pitch. In a comment on the Emphas.is blog back in January, I suggested they take heed of Aric Mayer’s analysis, and Benedicte replied positively to this suggestion. However, that doesn’t seem to have had an impact on their public call, which details how they intend to construct “a large-scale PORTRAIT INSTALLATION of as many of the women, men and children raped over a 4-day period in Walikale of the Democratic Republic of Congo, as possible.” #

#

2 Responses to “Thinking Images v.14: Looking for agents not victims in Congo”

  1. Hi David, thanks for the post. Congo is not a geographical location I am familiar with, but as a woman I certainly would like see the result of the “Besiege” project. I hope this project can provide some clues about the act of rape in war zones, to be shared worldwide. Apart from a weapon of war, historically rape has been a form of a war booty. The feminine body has always been viewed as a prize to be shared amongst the winning side, alongside lands and properties. This is not exclusive to one specific culture. (Remember the Vikings?)

    We have plenty evidence this in recent time – From the mass rape of German women by Russian armies avenging the Nazi (WW2), rape of Chinese and Korean “comfort women” by the Japanese army (WW2), right through to the prostitution epidemic in Vietnam, Cambodia and Thailand during/after the Vietnam war to accommodate the US soldiers. (SE Asian women are still heavily stigmatised by the “I love you long time” image. A form of cultural emasculation? Absolutely).

    What’s happening in Congo is a tragedy. But it is also another chapter in a long history of war rape that has yet to be changed.

    ZH, creative director Sojournposse.

  2. Thanks for the comment Zarina. I share your thoughts on the issue of rape as a weapon of war. The question though – following Aric’s analysis quoted above – is whether portraits of victims can ‘provide the clues about the act of rape in war zones’. Do you not think – especially with regard to photos of child victims – there is an issue about the association with, and perpetuation of, the trauma?

Leave a Reply