Robert from the Marmot’s Hole reported on a group of Japanese lawmakers that took out a full page ad in the Washington Post to present the Japanese viewpoint on the comfort woman controversy, and asked “If you’ve got the advert, I’d be keen to take a look at it”.
Here it is, courtesy of Occidentalism commenter Kaneganese.
June 14th, 2007 at 11:20 pm
[...] UPDATE: Occidentalism has posted a large image of the ad, but it’s still difficult to read. Couldn’t help but notice this part from Fact 5, however: They were working under a system of licensed prostitution that was commonplace around the world at the time. Many of the women, in fact, earned incomes far in excess of what were paid to field officers and even generals (as reported by the United States Office of War Information, Psychological Warfare Team Attached to US Army Forces, India-Burma Theater APO 689) and there are many testimonies attesting to the fact that they were well treated. [...]
June 14th, 2007 at 11:45 pm
This will cause quite a ruckus in Korea. It’s about time that the Japanese side started to state its case. Hopefully people will start looking into it and look at the facts. But I think we can safely assume that the Korean side will cover everything up.
June 14th, 2007 at 11:47 pm
Is it just me that feels that this is a strategic blunder on the part of whoever put the ad? Nobody cares about comfort women in the U.S.; I don’t see Rep. Honda making the rounds in cable news networks. These facts, true or false, to a casual reader will just look like denials and cover-ups(terrible timing with the whole Abu Ghraib still fresh on most American minds).
Fact 1: We really good in covering our tracks.
Fact 2: It’s not really us who did it. It’s those “independent contractors,” and we gave them a good spanking, honest.
Fact 3: Ok…ok…okay, there were some bad apples, but really, just a couple of them, just the rank and file. Gee, where did we hear this recently?
Fact 4: Your victims are lying. Truth not withstanding, not the best way to present your case.
Fact 5: Everyone else did it at that time, and oh yeah, we paid them really really well, so what if we gave them a little spank now and then, eh?
June 15th, 2007 at 12:32 am
Fact 6(Mofa)
Apology
Fact7(SYDNEY, March 27 Kyodo)
Mrs. Ruff O’Herne’s response
Fact8(U.S. Congressional Research Service )
Fact9
(Soh, Chung-Hee
Women’s Sexual Labor and State in Korean History)
(Sex Among Allies
by Katharine H. S. Moon)
June 15th, 2007 at 12:52 am
[...] Reader Infimum tipped us off to a large copy of the full page ad itself, with the names of the signers, here at Occidentalism. It’s still a little difficult to read, but you can probably find ways to magnify it. Of interest is that several members of the primary opposition group, the Democratic Party of Japan, also endorsed it, as well as Yoshiko Sakurai, a prominent journalist who was the main anchor on Kyo no Dekigoto, a national news program that ran at roughly 11:00 p.m. for more than 50 years until September last year. [...]
June 15th, 2007 at 1:09 am
Let me cite from “Japan’s Comfort Women” by Yuki Tanaka which U.S. Congressional Research Service based to support its paper.
As for the payment.
tion=view&gul=241&page=2&go_cnt=0
Surely Japan was responsible for controling the system insufficiently, causing the woman to suffer.
Japan apologized many times.
Who’s next to apologize?
June 15th, 2007 at 3:12 am
Sorry it’s in Japanese, but this is how the “comfort women” issue has started.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5TJZLisltU
June 15th, 2007 at 3:12 am
Sorry it’s in Japanese, but this is how the “comfort women” issue has started.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5TJZLisltU
June 15th, 2007 at 3:13 am
Matt
Hereis the enlarged version people can read the content.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:21 am
Representative Mike Honda should be the next Mike Nifong, the district attorney in Durham, North Carolina.
.
An African-American stripper falsely accused Duke lacrosse players of raping her at the party. The mass media and public, mostly African American, were enraged at the news. To please his constituency in Durham and secure the seat of the district attorney for the next term, Mr. Nifong pushed this Duke lacrosse case so hard without any concrete evidence, and he won the election last year.
.
The accused Duke students with the team of strong New York attorney defended themselves steadfastly, however, and they proved the testimony of the alleged victim was untrue. Now, the North Carolina Bar filed charges against Mr. Nihong for a series of his misconducts, and his trial started this week and it is aired live on TV right now. According to my observation, most of the media dislike Mr. Nifong these days.
.
In short, I think those Japanese congressmen and journalists did a great job, and its timing couldn’t be better. Rep. Mike Honda could not make any public statements yesterday. He must be still weeping in his office now.
June 15th, 2007 at 7:29 am
kjeff,
It appears this ad by the Japanese lawmakers was a counter action to the ad “The truth about ‘comfort women’” on the Washington Post in April by a Korean group. If nobody cares about comfort women in the U.S., why bother putting an expensive ad to raise the matter in the first place? Do you say the Korean group was stupid to have done that?
June 15th, 2007 at 7:43 am
First of all, it was civilians who put the ads. The lawmakers are the assentors. I think Korean newspapers are bit misleading.
“Japan Lawmakers Take Out U.S. Ad on Comfort Women
“
June 15th, 2007 at 9:48 am
hls,
Yes, it’s a counter-action…, but I’m affraid that anyone who’s not deeply interested in the issue will be troubled by it. What Kaneganese wrote above just reminded me of something. A quick glance at the “Assentors,” you’ll see that this is clearly not a united front. Personally, if I were to put up the ad, I would get rid of the “lawmakers” from the assentors list because one might wonder, “Well, how about the rest of them?” And for a rebuttal, that’s crucial in the way of, “Why should we believe you, if even some of you don’t?”
I haven’t seen the original ad, but with the wars, Pres. Bush’s ‘trouble of the week’ series, and Paris Hilton’s jail-thingy, Americans have enough on their plate. Do you really think anyone beside first generation Korean immigrants(I’m not even going to generalize all Korean-Americans) care?
I haven’t seen the ad, so I can’t really comment on it, but whatever that ad is, I doubt that it has anything to do with the issue itself. It’s probably just to score some points politically or otherwise. I could say the same way about the counter-ad; I can just imagine how this will translate come election time. Tomomi Inada(just to pick a name) stood up strong for Japanese interest overseas, and things of that nature. But, overall, I think it hurts their cause. If I were them, I would put up an apology ad. Yes…yes…yes, not another apology, but I think in this case, it’ll serve the purpose extremely well. I would do a general admittance of “hardship” without really admitting wrongdoings. The longer you can drag this part, the better; it’d sound more sincere. And to anticipate those who are never going to be satisfied with anything, do a general admittance of general disagreement(even among yourselves, which usually leads to more credence), and that you have people(better yet, committee) who are working to find the truth. I don’t think ‘that’ ad is going against any stand/policy Japanese government has on the issue, and if anyone else is still pressing the case, they will look like a jackass. Most americans don’t even care enough to find the ‘truth’, the facts of their own present wars, do you really they will about someone else’s that happened more than half a century ago?
June 15th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
[...] UPDATE: As expected this ad has opened a firestorm of debate. You can read a whole lot more on this development over at the Marmot’s Hole, Ampontan, and Occidentalism. Occidentalism has a blown up version of the ad that you can read here. [...]
June 15th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
[...] Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post, Occidentalism; Matt@O has published the entire ad. Interesting. - Ampontan comments on this here. [...]
June 15th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
ponta:
Are those “facts” (this is not sarcasim, just an emphasis) you posted part of the ad, or those you wrote up?
.
And so the Japanese Empire Strikes Back! (Sorry for the pun, couldn’t resist it ^_^) I must see a bigber version…..
June 15th, 2007 at 5:10 pm
As for the ad, I think you can read it
(just click, it will enlarge)
As for the facts 6-9, I showed the sources.
June 15th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
kjeff,
Do you really mean that? We know you know the ad was intended for the global audience. Washington Post is not a local paper for the local readership. That is why you aussies are talking about it, isn’t it? Or are you a Korean American or Korean Korean?
That is exactly what the Korean Koreans have told the Japanese for years now. And every time they made a new apology the Koreans wanted more. Maybe a knowledgeable guy like Ponta can show you how all this developed in chronological detail.
So you admit the first accusatory ad by the Korean group was not worth a damn?
June 15th, 2007 at 7:46 pm
This is getting interesting.
The fabrication is turned aver one by one like Othelo.
Japan had better calculate huge amount of liquidated damage of defamation against Korea and China.
Chinese Mafia, the wairepuller of Mike Honda, showed the cloven hoof at good timing.
http://www.sankei.co.jp/kokusai/usa/070603/usa070603004.htm
Following is US army’s official report stating ‘comfort girl’ is just a prostitute.
http://www.exordio.com/1939-1945/codex/Documentos/report-49-USA-orig.html
June 15th, 2007 at 8:10 pm
Ken:
Yes it is, although I think things are going the other way than what you believe.
June 15th, 2007 at 8:41 pm
General Tiger:
Oh, Yeah? Which “facts†of the above advertisement do you claim fabrications by the Japanese?
June 15th, 2007 at 10:08 pm
Sweet Water:
I should have made myself more clear: I mean that there is no “fabrication” that are being turned over one by one.
.
Sad to see the flaming over at Marmot’s Hole, while *most* of us over here are civil enough.
June 16th, 2007 at 2:36 am
Finally, the Japanese has decided to take a stance on the issue. All the lies coming from the Korean government will slowly be exposed and the truth about Koreans pimping their own kind will be known. Hopefully millions of brainwashed Koreans, including quite a few of them in this forum, will wake up and learn the complicity of their fellow Koreans in the issue. This finger-pointing of Koreans at others to hide their own failures and rottenness has got to stop. They do nothing but embarrass themselves in the end.
Then again, anyone who reads the news regularly already knows that single Korean women coming to the US, Australia, and other developed, mostly Western countries already have a reputation for, um, you know. So this revelation of Korean whores during that time period shouldn’t really be a stretch, let alone a shocker. Not much has changed.
June 17th, 2007 at 12:10 am
If you want evidence shows the lies of the Japanese governments stance. These Japanese documents describe the ages of the girls. The Japanese Government official stance is as follows….
“..Girls only over the ages of 21 were engaged…”
However we can see the health records showed these girls to be younger……much younger. Around 15 and 16 years old.
http://blog.naver.com/cms1530/
Japan is trying to do damage control on the comfort women issue issue but they are being busted by their own documents. Sounds like the Dokdo issue.
June 17th, 2007 at 1:14 am
The Japanese are digging themselves into a huge hole on this one.
Fact 1 states that Japan ordered that only women over 21 be hired as a comfort woman.
Fact 2 states Japanese police regulated
illegal brokers.
These facts are consistent with the fact the women under 21 were working; either they were illegally recruited or they were illegally working, or they were victimized by the illegal owners.
On a side, remember fact 9 I posted?
.
June 17th, 2007 at 3:41 am
Toadface,
I had not commented on this, but I will if you would like me to.
The ad said that “Directive 36″ allowed only women 21 years or older and with permission of their parents to work as “comfort women.” That is evidence that the Japanese had safeguards and were being selective, which suggests that they were not going around kidnapping young women in 1938, when the directive was written.
The veneral disease check list that you linked to was prepared in 1943, five years after the 1938 directive. The ages of the women on the list were 15, 16, 17, 18, 18, 18, 20, 20, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 31, 32
Was that “one” comfort station violating the 1938 directive or had the directive been relaxed by 1943? Could younger women become comfort women with the permission of their parents? Did the brokers give fake ages for the women when they signed them up, but the women gave real ages when they got their VD check? Maybe, those are some facts that need to be checked?However, even today, underaged women are working as prostitutes in bars around the world, and many public officials turn a blind eye to it. I wonder how many Japanese officials were concerned about enforcing a 21-year-old age limit at the height of the war in 1943, which was more than sixty years ago?
By 1944, ads in Korean newspapers were advertising for comfort women who were 17 or older, which would be 16 in Korean age. Korean Newspaper Ads for Comfort Women in 1944.
By the way, in World War II the minimum enlistment age in the US was 17, but boys younger than 17 could join with their parent’s permission. Fifteen and sixteen year old American boys were joining the US military in World War II, and many were killed and wounded.
June 17th, 2007 at 6:02 am
Just to clarify, the comment addressed to Mr. Gerry was posted at Marmomot Hall by Frogmouth, and I copied and paseted, though I think Frogmouth and Toadface is obviously identical.(Toadface, , correct me if I am wrong)
Toadmouth,
Do Korean people will accuse, say the US because Korean woman were trafficated into the US and working in the brothels illegally though the US is regulating such practice?
June 17th, 2007 at 6:57 am
Here is my cut and pasted response.
Gerry, all the ads show is that the Japanese military blatantly ignored their own “laws” and that their current government is a pack of liars.
Stop being so slippery by passing the buck on this issue. The Japanese Army were the end users of these girls and thus fully responsible for which women were on their backs putting out or sent home. What a pathetic excuse.
The Japanese government has the brass balls to publish a propaganda flyer stating they stayed were within the boundaries of their own regulations when they operated these “comfort stations” during the occupation era.
Next comes out a document that proves without a doubt that the Japanese government is lying. They did knowingly violate their own protocol by allowing these underage girls to be a part of this system.
http://blog.naver.com/cms1530/
What’s at issue here is the not only the past atrocities but rather the “integrity?” of the Japanese politicians who are lobbying to have this issue dropped. When they get busted like this how can we trust a single word they say?
June 17th, 2007 at 7:00 am
[...] Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post · Occidentalism Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post · Occidentalism: Robert from the Marmot’s Hole reported on a group of Japanese lawmakers that took out a full page ad in the Washington Post to present the Japanese viewpoint on the comfort woman controversy, and asked “If you’ve got the advert, I’d be keen to take a look at itâ€. [...]
June 17th, 2007 at 7:05 am
That might be. But I also say, what is at stake is your integrity and Korean govenment’s integrity.
As I said at Marmoto hall, denying what didn’t happened is comaptible with taking responsibility for what actuall what happened.
Don’t pass the buck?
Japan was mainly to blame.
Japan apologized severaly times paid compensatoins.
Don’t pass the buck.Korean people need to face the rest of the story in which Korean brokers abused the Korean women under Japanese rule and under Korean regime after “liberation”.
June 17th, 2007 at 8:26 am
I would say that they are expressing the viewpoint of the Committee for Historical Facts, but I’m not sure if it’s accurate to say that they are presenting the “Japanese” viewpoint, since one does not hear or read a single, coherent “Japanese viewpoint” being expressed within Japan.
June 17th, 2007 at 8:33 am
I agree.
And if somebody wants to hear what the government’s opinion, I think there is no way but to refer to the statement made by the PM and chief secretary
June 17th, 2007 at 8:56 am
[...] Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post · Occidentalism [...]
June 17th, 2007 at 9:01 am
[...] I think that this debate is too often pigeon-holed into a question of whether militaries’ instrumental use of prostitution or military sexual slavery was widespread or not. The fact that many people seem to think of prostitution as a natural and acceptable underbelly of society is disgusting, why do we have to put up with any of this, and how to the crimes of many others exempt Japan from it’s systematic (key word) abuse and utilization of women’s bodies? I’m still waiting to hear about the fallout from this ad. Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post · Occidentalism [...]
June 17th, 2007 at 11:25 am
Ponta, good point. But…I think it would lend a lot of weight to the statement if it were officially approved by the Diet, since the PM/Chief Cabinet Secretary change.
June 17th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
Kenzo
But the members of the Diet change too.
June 17th, 2007 at 4:24 pm
Over at the Marmot’s Hole, Robert Koehler has posted an excellent piece on precisely why he takes offense at the Washington Post advertisement. Very balanced, pulls no punches—Korea and the US come in for their share of criticism. Mr. Bevers, in particular, ought to be particularly interested in this posting since, in it, Mr. Koehler responds to his challenge to refute the ad’s “facts” one by one. For anyone who’s interested, the posting is here:
http://www.rjkoehler.com/2007/06/18/more-on-the-comfort-women-ad/
June 17th, 2007 at 4:58 pm
I have some comments about that, but I think I will do it over at the marmots hole.
June 17th, 2007 at 5:44 pm
Ut videam
I read his post as complaing of the ad not telling the whole story. That is true, no space on the newspaper can afford to give the whole story.
From now on why not criticize the Korean response to the issue?
After all, even ad admit the women suffered and it is with pround regret they contemplate this tragedy”
Keep ignoring thir own wrongs should be more offensive.
As I suggested on the Marmot hole, why not Korean government and people set an example by giving more
apologies and compensatoins than Japan to the comfort women under Korean government?
June 17th, 2007 at 5:57 pm
ponta,
Because that’s NOT THE ISSUE HERE. The issue is the ad’s denial of coercion, repeatedly asserting that the “comfort station” system was one of prostitution (implying the women were knowing and willing participants) and not of sexual slavery. There is ample evidence that this is not the case. Further, as Mr. Koehler points out, the lack of documentary evidence trumpeted by the ad is quite likely the result of the orgy of incineration that took place between the Japanese surrender and the arrival of occupation forces.
When people deny the Holocaust, what is the appropriate response? Should we temporize about the failures of the US and other countries to accept Jewish refugees because of their own latent anti-Semitism? Take time to note the participation of Jewish collaborators in the liquidations? No. We should take the deniers to the woodshed. The wrongdoing of other parties deserves to be addressed, but in another forum.
Focus on the issue at hand. Drop the deflection routine. This ad denies a significant aspect of the atrocities of the comfort station system: coercion. For that reason, it deserves rebuttal. And, suitably rebutted, the backers of the ad deserve the scorn and censure of all fair-minded people, regardless of nationality.
June 17th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
Do Koreans really care about sex slaves?
800 Korean men and not one lifted a finger to help the girl even after seeing her bruises and wounds.
See South Korean girl, 14, held as sex slave for 6-months
June 17th, 2007 at 6:15 pm
bad_moon_rising: Nice red herring. Yet another variation on the tired old deflection routine. At least ponta’s deflections are related to the same war.
June 17th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
http://mdn.mainichi-msn.co.jp/waiwai/archive/news/2002/06/20020620p2g00m0dm998000c.html
Japan chained to underground sex slave industry
With the United States government having labeled Japan as a final destination for many sex slave victims, international society has come to view the Land of the Rising Sun as immoral, according to Shukan Jitsuwa (7/4). Foreign Ministry officials say they have expressed dissent toward the report that labels Japan as “having insufficient countermeasures to sex slavery, but is trying.” They say the issue is a matter for the National Police Agency and Justice Ministry to handle.
NPA officials say they’ll let the public know when they discover any instances of sex slavery, while the Justice Ministry claims no record exists of slaves entering Japan.
Others are certain, though, that Japan has become a haven for forced sex slaves.
“A few years ago, quite a deal of attention was being paid to girls around 20 coming here from Eastern Europe, particularly Rumania and Ukraine. You could buy one of those girls for about 1 million yen,” a source tells Shukan Jitsuwa.
Sex slavery, according to the raunchy rag, involves a buyer, an intermediary and a seller. Most of the time, it’s the middleman who picks up the biggest share of the profits to be made in the sale of human flesh.
“They target countries where prices are cheap. The intermediary will go to the parents of any girl they’re looking for and offer them a cash loan several times what they’d usually make in a year in exchange for their daughter. The daughter wouldn’t be returned until the loan has been paid off. To do that, the girl is brought to Japan,” the source says. “Once here, she’ll be made to work in an underground sex shop or whatever, and can’t return home until her buyer can no longer make any money out of her. Intermediaries make the most money because they profit on price differentiation between countries.”
Girls from poorer areas of Thailand and Burma apparently find themselves sold into slavery and transported to Taiwan and Japan.
“Brokers send at least 1,000 Thai girls a year to Japan,” a member of a Thai human rights organization tells Shukan Jitsuwa.
Japanese kiddy sex tours to Thailand and the Philippines are well known, but less publicized are the girls from these countries who end up as prostitutes in Japan. Just before the start of the World Cup, authorities began cracking down on foreign sex workers across the country, many of whom were effectively sex slaves.
“Osaka’s Umeda district was famous for its Thai streetwalkers, but, as many expected, they were all busted by the end of February this year,” a sex industry writer tells Shukan Jitsuwa. Police said they picked up 67 women in the raids for breaking either the anti-prostitution or immigration laws. Of the 67 arrested, 26 were deported. Some of those arrested were as young as 15.
“Most of these women sneaked into Japan,” the sex industry writer says. “They’ve got to pay a broker 5 million yen to get here, which includes the price of a fake passport. They first go into prostitution so they can pay off their loan. Once they’ve done that, they stay in the job so they can send money back to their parents.”
With the money borrowed to leave their homelands and surreptitious entry into the country, Japan has been turned into a Mecca for prostitutes.
“Even if a woman’s deported, she’s got no choice but to return to Japan if she wants to repay her debts,” a source tells Shukan Jitsuwa. “She still has to pay the 5 million yen fee to be smuggled in here. But if Customs refuse her entry, she’s basically got no choice but to work for free in some other country.”
June 17th, 2007 at 6:46 pm
Read the accusation of the Honda’s resolution. What they are accusing of is the denial, coersion, and assertion from the military which there is not a SINGLE evidence to back it up.
Quite likely?? That’s a leap of faith. What Mr. Koehler is seeking in legal definition, is probatio diabolica. In other words, since IJA can’t prove that the evidence DOES NOT exist, it MUST EXIST.
Personal testimonies (that changes periodically) without cross examination carries no more weight than me accusing of you being a child molester.
June 17th, 2007 at 6:57 pm
Why NOT? Practice what you preach. It’s universal considering the fact that Koreans did this to their own people after WWII.
June 17th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
A good point. I don’t think Mr. Koehler has glanced over the Japanese documents. Japanese document include the papers comfort women were under Japan control in terms of medical check on VD. If Japans wanted to hide the fact about the comfort station, she burned every documents concerning the comfort station.
It is just faith, or hope that Japan must have been
evil than anybody can think of that make somebody leap from the premise to that conclusion.
The fact is that Japan and Korea and the US did not think the military brothels including recruitiing system themselves were bad.
That was the level of morality at the time.
I think it is easily understandable for people who know Korean situation:They don’t give shit about the victimized women under Korean government even now.
June 18th, 2007 at 12:19 am
[...] Ad about comfort women in the Washington Post · Occidentalism [...]
June 18th, 2007 at 12:00 pm
Kenzo
But the members of the Diet change too.
Ponta…haha…you don’t think anyone’s going to fall for that, do you? Just because they change does not mean the legislation they voted on is no longer valid.
The point is that something that is voted on is stronger than something that is said by a leader. I still hold that certain PM apologies were made simply to placate the other side, either before an official visit or because it was politically expedient.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:08 pm
Point taken. But the revisionists should not profit from the bad act of their “client,” i.e., the orgy of incineration. That’s tantamount to having the star witness in a murder case killed, then trumpeting the fact that there are no witnesses. Dead men tell no tales, and neither do burned documents.So, while the revisionists can crow that “No historical document has ever been found… that women were forced against their will into prostitution by the Japanese army,” the other side can just as validly state “We will probably never know whether documentation existed to support or refute claims of coercion, as the Japanese government and army engaged in an orgy of incineration of potentially incriminating documents prior to the arrival of occupation forces.” When it’s well-established fact that documents were destroyed on a grand scale, it’s the worst sort of sophistry to argue innocence based on the lack of documentary evidence.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:11 pm
Tu quoque, tu quoque…
June 18th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Addendum to #49 - In a criminal trial, if it can be proven that a witness was silenced by the defendant, rules of criminal procedure allow that fact to be introduced against the defendant. The defendant is not allowed to profit from a bad act. Nothing can be legally be inferred from the witness’s silence, but the fact that he was silenced is fair game. So, too, in this case. While nothing can be inferred from the lack of documents, the fact of the orgy of incineration is damning testimony against the IJA.
June 18th, 2007 at 5:50 pm
Ut videam
Is your logic as follows?
By the way do you think at present that rules of a criminal court should be applied to this issue?
If so in what degree? I mean do you think that all the rules in a criminal court should be applied? Or do you think a part of them should be?
If you are thinking a part should be applied what is the reason of it? I mean if so you are claiming ruleX should be applied but ruleY not, what makes the difference?
June 18th, 2007 at 6:11 pm
Ut videam
Thanks
There is no document that the official ordered to recruit women forcibly.
There is document that the official ordered to regulate the illegal brokers.
As I understand it, one of the Robert points is since Korean government has been like that, but still there have been illegal brokers rampant in Korea despite the regulation, Japan also must have been like that.
It might or it might not,
But note coercion did take place. there is a record that Japanese police arrested such brokers.
It is true that Japanese troop burned some of military document which might works against Japanese military. But even in case of the secret operation of 731 troop where it is said the documents were destroyed systematically, there are still Japanese documents about it which is not in favor of Japanese position.
And military document is not all the document. There are newspaper and magazine. A newspaper talks about.e.g., the police operation against the illegal brokers The magazine talks about the prostitutes who entered the business out of poverty.
As I said, in case of comfort station, there is no need to destroy the document. People took it for granted that the lives were like that. It was after the sensational political movement in the late 80’s people came to realise that that was a big issue.
For instance,
thisis the film depicting the comfort women produced in 1959, after the was but long before any issue concerning the comfort station came out.
And the following is the report written in 1953
Note he was ordered to destroy the film but he has no hesitation to talk about the comfort women.
And you don’t need to destroy the documents that you don’t think works against your position. At the time people took it for granted that comfort station was a part of lives and didn’t even think the document about it would work against them.
And even among testimonies examined by the scholars, as I pointed elsewhere, out of 20 testimonies, 4 cases were cases
where the women were said to be recruited forcibly by Japanese officials.
One women said she was sold by her father on a different occasion.
Another woman was the the women who sued Japanese government to return the enormous amount of money she earned while she was a comfort woman.
Still others were women who said they worked in a comfort stations where there were no military brothels.
Of course, that does not mean they were well treated. That is as bad as saying Korean women in the brothels now are well treated.
As I said, it is easily imaginable that there were cases where the woman suffered indescribable hardship. And it happen under Japanese rule, thus, PMs apologized. For instance, Koizumi said,
June 18th, 2007 at 6:16 pm
Ut videam
I am afrad you missed his point.
Japan committed a crime. She admitted she did wrong, apologized.
Korean committed the same kind of crime,she has never admitted nor apologized. But keep blaming japan for the crime.
This is the situation. Nobody is saying two wrongs make a right.
June 19th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
Let me point out that the so-called “comfort woman issue” between Japan and Korea has already ended in 1965, by the following treaty.
“The agreement between Japan and Republic of Korea in the resolution of the problem regarding assets and right of claim, and in the economic assistance”(June 22, 1965)
*I translated this title from the official text written in Japanese named “財産åŠã³è«‹æ±‚権ã«é–¢ã™ã‚‹å•é¡Œã®è§£æ±ºä¸¦ã³ã«çµŒæ¸ˆå”力ã«é–¢ã™ã‚‹æ—¥æœ¬å›½ã¨å¤§éŸ“民国ã¨ã®é–“ã®å”定”. ( http://www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~worldjpn/documents/texts/JPKR/19650622.T9J.html)
This agreement(was written in Japanese and Korean) stipulated that:
1)Japan shall provide Japanese products and shall render the service by Japanese people which equal to three hundred million dollar, for 10 years from the date that this agreement will come into force, without compensation.
2)the problem was settled completely and finally, regarding the assets of both countries and nationals(including corporations), right and profit, and of the right of claim between both countries(Japan and Korea) .