JAPAN

Headless In Tokyo

Sure, Aso is atrocious. But so were his predecessors. Here's why Japan's politicians are so bad.

Katsumi Kasahara / AP
Stepping Down: Nakagawa in Tokyo
 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

It's hard not to pity Shoichi Nakagawa. By now it seems the whole world has heard about the shame of Japan's former finance minister, who turned up apparently drunk at a G7 conference in Rome on Feb. 14. Nakagawa, who slurred his words and seemed to nod off during a press conference, resigned in disgrace soon after.

The real scandal, though, may be the guy who stayed.

Prime Minister Taro Aso, the man responsible for appointing Nakagawa, is still on the job—despite approval ratings in the single digits and an apparent lack of any coherent plan for rescuing the world's second-largest economy from what may become its steepest slump since World War II. Aso's propensity for gaffes—he once said he wanted to turn Japan into a country "where the richest Jews would want to live"—and his failure to find a modus vivendi with the emboldened opposition have condemned Japan to paralysis at just the moment when it's in dire need of strong leadership.

Yet Aso's agony—and that of his party, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)—has even deeper significance. His failings at this crucial moment underscore the country's dramatic leadership deficit. Never, it seems, have the Japanese felt the absence of credible politicians quite so acutely. On Feb. 27 the mainstream Asahi Shimbun newspaper captured the mood in an op-ed when it pleaded, "Enough with the political void." As that line suggested, what's most striking about Aso's shortcomings is how normal they are. Modern-day Japan is a major force in global business, culture and technology—yet in some ways it is governed like a banana republic. Which raises a key question: why?

The current prime minister's failings shouldn't come as a complete surprise. There were always reasons to have low expectations of Aso, who took the job without ever receiving a mandate from the electorate; he was picked by fellow members of the ruling LDP following the resignation of two similarly feckless LDP prime ministers in as many years. His immediate predecessor, Yasuo Fukuda, shocked the nation by almost casually throwing in the towel after just a year on the job, at a surprise press conference on Sept. 1, 2008. And his predecessor, Shinzo Abe, almost wept as he cited unspecified "health reasons" when announcing his decision to step down—also after just 12 months in office.

Yet Aso's performance has been lame even by these low standards. His brief term has been marred by crippling legislative gridlock and an ill-conceived (and unpopular) scheme to stimulate the economy by sending the equivalent of $120 to every taxpayer in the country. Even before he became prime minister, his career had been marred by epic gaffes. He once accused the opposition party of acting like Nazis when they blocked legislation he favored, praised Japan's harsh colonial rule in Korea and Taiwan, and cracked insensitive jokes about Alzheimer's patients.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Michael Grist @ 03/13/2009 9:43:30 PM

    Japan needs an Obama figure- but it's difficult to imagine that really happening since Obama is from America- he's loved here because he's so different and they don't need to take a risk to get behind him. Perhaps if a leader were to come out of Okinawa- the most laid-back part of Japan I know of, and the one least likely to be connected too strongly to Kasumigaseki and all its intrinsic corruption.
    It'll change as the demographic of the country changes and they have to start enfranchising Koreans and Chinese. That's when we'll the minorities having some power, and the current strangle-hold will break. Probably the Japanese can't do it on their own.

  • Posted By: Simon Foston @ 03/11/2009 8:24:03 PM

    This is a good article but it doesn't mention an important detail. For most of the last sixty years there have been big disparities in the values of votes in rural and urban constituencies, caused largely by a failure to significantly redraw the constituency boundaries when most of the population moved out of the countryside and into the big cities. In some extreme cases it took about half a million voters to elect a Diet member in an urban constituency compared to a hundred thousand voters in a rural area. The LDP carefully exploited this disparity with a platform designed to appeal to rural conservatives, farmers and small business owners, and once politicians' powerbases were secure it became much easier to pass on power to their sons. As matters stand, a lot of rural politicians now realise that big changes are necessary but are too scared to do anything that might alienate elderly conservative voters who see no reason to change the status quo.

  • Posted By: RoyalRook @ 03/08/2009 5:44:49 PM

    Bla, bla, bla, I am so bored. House of Representative rules --- The end of the that nation called Japan.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg
 
The Peek
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu